https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754839 CESTAT Bangalore allowed appellant's appeal regarding denied CENVAT credit of service tax. The appellant had availed credit based on Input Service Distributor bill from Head Office, which authorities rejected claiming it lacked requisite particulars under Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. CESTAT held that appellant produced challan evidencing service tax payment by Head Office and invoice from Head Office, complying with CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 provisions. The adjudication authority's findings on registration requirements were factually incorrect. The impugned order was set aside, making appellant eligible for the CENVAT credit. en-us Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jul 2024 07:48:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754839 CESTAT Bangalore allowed appellant's appeal regarding denied CENVAT credit of service tax. The appellant had availed credit based on Input Service Distributor bill from Head Office, which authorities rejected claiming it lacked requisite particulars under Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. CESTAT held that appellant produced challan evidencing service tax payment by Head Office and invoice from Head Office, complying with CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 provisions. The adjudication authority's findings on registration requirements were factually incorrect. The impugned order was set aside, making appellant eligible for the CENVAT credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754839