<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 34 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37291</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ application challenging the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the Income Tax Officer had prima facie grounds for believing in non-disclosure of material facts by the assessee. The court emphasized that the notice was not without jurisdiction and directed the Income Tax Officer to further consider the materials on record to determine the fulfillment of conditions under Section 147 for exercising jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:31:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 34 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37291</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ application challenging the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the Income Tax Officer had prima facie grounds for believing in non-disclosure of material facts by the assessee. The court emphasized that the notice was not without jurisdiction and directed the Income Tax Officer to further consider the materials on record to determine the fulfillment of conditions under Section 147 for exercising jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>