<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 328 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456122</link>
    <description>Section 53 of the Karnataka State Universities Act was treated as a self-contained code for affiliation matters, requiring the State Government&#039;s role under sub-section (5) to be followed in grant, continuation, and refusal of affiliation. The proviso to sub-section (9) was construed as a limited exception relating only to continuation of affiliation and not as an independent source of power for the University to refuse affiliation on its own. General powers under Section 4 and claimed incidental powers could not override this specific statutory procedure. Refusal of continuation of affiliation without submitting the matter to the State Government was therefore inconsistent with the Act, and the impugned communication was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 15:36:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 328 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456122</link>
      <description>Section 53 of the Karnataka State Universities Act was treated as a self-contained code for affiliation matters, requiring the State Government&#039;s role under sub-section (5) to be followed in grant, continuation, and refusal of affiliation. The proviso to sub-section (9) was construed as a limited exception relating only to continuation of affiliation and not as an independent source of power for the University to refuse affiliation on its own. General powers under Section 4 and claimed incidental powers could not override this specific statutory procedure. Refusal of continuation of affiliation without submitting the matter to the State Government was therefore inconsistent with the Act, and the impugned communication was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>