<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 44 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37286</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the bad debt deductions under section 36(2)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the successor company could claim relief for bad debts, emphasizing that the focus is on the debt being accounted for in the income of the same business, not the original creditor&#039;s identity. The alternative claim under section 28(1) was rejected as it pertained to the predecessor partnership firm&#039;s business. The Court clarified that sections 28 and 36 aim to compute assessable business income, not for personal relief. The assessee was awarded costs of Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:29:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 44 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37286</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the bad debt deductions under section 36(2)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the successor company could claim relief for bad debts, emphasizing that the focus is on the debt being accounted for in the income of the same business, not the original creditor&#039;s identity. The alternative claim under section 28(1) was rejected as it pertained to the predecessor partnership firm&#039;s business. The Court clarified that sections 28 and 36 aim to compute assessable business income, not for personal relief. The assessee was awarded costs of Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>