<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 1033 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was unjustified, as the assessee had made full disclosure of facts and there was a genuine difference of opinion regarding the income&#039;s taxability under a specific head. Consequently, the Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the CIT(A) and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 10:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 1033 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was unjustified, as the assessee had made full disclosure of facts and there was a genuine difference of opinion regarding the income&#039;s taxability under a specific head. Consequently, the Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the CIT(A) and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>