<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 55 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754835</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC dismissed an appeal challenging a Single Judge&#039;s order that granted relief to a respondent regarding vehicle release and tax levy. The court held that mechanical detention of goods in transit cannot be based solely on transportation beyond destination and diversion to another location. The court found no evidence of tax evasion intent when petitioners sought delivery to the intended destination. Regarding the second ground of goods being undervalued, no supporting material was presented. The court reaffirmed the settled legal position that undervaluation alone cannot justify seizure of goods in transit by inspecting authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 55 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754835</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC dismissed an appeal challenging a Single Judge&#039;s order that granted relief to a respondent regarding vehicle release and tax levy. The court held that mechanical detention of goods in transit cannot be based solely on transportation beyond destination and diversion to another location. The court found no evidence of tax evasion intent when petitioners sought delivery to the intended destination. Regarding the second ground of goods being undervalued, no supporting material was presented. The court reaffirmed the settled legal position that undervaluation alone cannot justify seizure of goods in transit by inspecting authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>