https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754831 HC allowed petitioner's writ petition challenging tax demand. The court found the rejection of adjournment request hyper-technical, noting it was the first request at personal hearing stage. HC set aside the order and demand notice, directing a fresh personal hearing under Section 75 (4) and (5) of Karnataka GST Act, emphasizing procedural fairness and opportunity to be heard. en-us Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 May 2025 09:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754831 HC allowed petitioner's writ petition challenging tax demand. The court found the rejection of adjournment request hyper-technical, noting it was the first request at personal hearing stage. HC set aside the order and demand notice, directing a fresh personal hearing under Section 75 (4) and (5) of Karnataka GST Act, emphasizing procedural fairness and opportunity to be heard. Case-Laws GST Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754831