<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 50 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754830</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation after dealer&#039;s death. Court quashed impugned order and directed respondent to serve fresh notice, giving petitioner opportunity to explain Input Tax Credit mismatch. Respondent mandated to pass new order within three months, ensuring procedural fairness for legal heir of deceased registered dealer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 50 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754830</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation after dealer&#039;s death. Court quashed impugned order and directed respondent to serve fresh notice, giving petitioner opportunity to explain Input Tax Credit mismatch. Respondent mandated to pass new order within three months, ensuring procedural fairness for legal heir of deceased registered dealer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>