<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court ruled no intent to evade tax in e-way bill case. Rs. 25,000 penalty imposed. Petitioner wins refund.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78992</link>
    <description>The High Court reviewed the validity of the show cause notice (SCN) and assessment order u/s 129 of the CGST Act. The issue centered on penalty imposition due to non-updation of the e-way bill resulting from goods transfer to another vehicle. The court found no evidence of intent to contravene the Act or evade tax. Consequently, a general penalty of Rs. 25,000 was imposed on the petitioner u/s 125 of the CGST Act. The impugned notice and order were set aside, with a direction for the respondents to refund the tax after deducting the penalty. The court deemed it just to levy the maximum penalty of Rs. 25,000, ultimately allowing the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:32:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:32:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court ruled no intent to evade tax in e-way bill case. Rs. 25,000 penalty imposed. Petitioner wins refund.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78992</link>
      <description>The High Court reviewed the validity of the show cause notice (SCN) and assessment order u/s 129 of the CGST Act. The issue centered on penalty imposition due to non-updation of the e-way bill resulting from goods transfer to another vehicle. The court found no evidence of intent to contravene the Act or evade tax. Consequently, a general penalty of Rs. 25,000 was imposed on the petitioner u/s 125 of the CGST Act. The impugned notice and order were set aside, with a direction for the respondents to refund the tax after deducting the penalty. The court deemed it just to levy the maximum penalty of Rs. 25,000, ultimately allowing the petition.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:32:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>