<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 44 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754824</link>
    <description>Karnataka HC set aside SCN and assessment order imposing penalty under Section 129 CGST Act for non-updation of e-way bill during vehicle breakdown and goods transfer. Court found no intention to contravene CGST provisions or evade tax payment. HC invoked Section 125 CGST Act, imposing general penalty of Rs. 25,000 instead, directing respondents to refund tax paid by petitioner after deducting penalty amount. Petition allowed with modified penalty structure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 44 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754824</link>
      <description>Karnataka HC set aside SCN and assessment order imposing penalty under Section 129 CGST Act for non-updation of e-way bill during vehicle breakdown and goods transfer. Court found no intention to contravene CGST provisions or evade tax payment. HC invoked Section 125 CGST Act, imposing general penalty of Rs. 25,000 instead, directing respondents to refund tax paid by petitioner after deducting penalty amount. Petition allowed with modified penalty structure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>