<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal Rules Sale Proceeds as Capital Gains, Qualifies for Exemption u/s 54F and 54.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78989</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the sale proceeds of residential units should be treated as capital gains or business receipts. It was found that the transactions were part of a land transfer for development by a builder, not a business activity by the assessee. The long-term capital gain from the land transfer was eligible for exemption u/s 54F as the proceeds were reinvested in residential flats. Flats sold within 36 months attracted short-term capital gain, while those held longer qualified for long-term capital gain benefit u/s 54. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the transactions were capital gains, not business receipts, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals. Additionally, the valuation report supported the assessee&#039;s inv.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:32:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:32:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal Rules Sale Proceeds as Capital Gains, Qualifies for Exemption u/s 54F and 54.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78989</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the sale proceeds of residential units should be treated as capital gains or business receipts. It was found that the transactions were part of a land transfer for development by a builder, not a business activity by the assessee. The long-term capital gain from the land transfer was eligible for exemption u/s 54F as the proceeds were reinvested in residential flats. Flats sold within 36 months attracted short-term capital gain, while those held longer qualified for long-term capital gain benefit u/s 54. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the transactions were capital gains, not business receipts, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals. Additionally, the valuation report supported the assessee&#039;s inv.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:32:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>