<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT rectified intimation denial for Form 10BB. Appellant&#039;s return deemed invalid, taxed without exemption. Ruling favors appellant citing court judgment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78978</link>
    <description>The ITAT decision addressed rectification of intimation u/s 154, relating to denial of claim u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) due to non-filing of Form 10BB. The appellant&#039;s income return was deemed invalid, leading to taxation without exemption u/ss 10(23c)(iiiad) or 11. The appellant, with 12 units and gross receipts on record, cited a relevant court judgment supporting their eligibility for exemption. The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, stating the issue was non-debatable based on the court precedent, directing the AO to implement the petitioner&#039;s section 154 application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:31:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:31:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT rectified intimation denial for Form 10BB. Appellant&#039;s return deemed invalid, taxed without exemption. Ruling favors appellant citing court judgment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78978</link>
      <description>The ITAT decision addressed rectification of intimation u/s 154, relating to denial of claim u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) due to non-filing of Form 10BB. The appellant&#039;s income return was deemed invalid, leading to taxation without exemption u/ss 10(23c)(iiiad) or 11. The appellant, with 12 units and gross receipts on record, cited a relevant court judgment supporting their eligibility for exemption. The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, stating the issue was non-debatable based on the court precedent, directing the AO to implement the petitioner&#039;s section 154 application.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:31:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>