<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1908 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456115</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to entertain the Central Excise appeal because of the low tax effect. The appeal was dismissed on that basis, and the question of law was expressly kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 20:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1908 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456115</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to entertain the Central Excise appeal because of the low tax effect. The appeal was dismissed on that basis, and the question of law was expressly kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>