https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456110 The SC acquitted the appellant of murder charges, setting aside the death sentence due to unreliable prosecution evidence. The Court identified significant conflicts between medical and eye-witness testimony, suspicious delays in sending evidence for ballistic examination, and a delay in interrogating the accused, which cast doubt on the prosecution's case. A separate judgment by Jagannadhadas, J., and Sinha, J., concurred with the acquittal, primarily citing the latter two issues, but disagreed on the inadmissibility of the draftsman's evidence under Section 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Jun 2024 13:06:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456110 The SC acquitted the appellant of murder charges, setting aside the death sentence due to unreliable prosecution evidence. The Court identified significant conflicts between medical and eye-witness testimony, suspicious delays in sending evidence for ballistic examination, and a delay in interrogating the accused, which cast doubt on the prosecution's case. A separate judgment by Jagannadhadas, J., and Sinha, J., concurred with the acquittal, primarily citing the latter two issues, but disagreed on the inadmissibility of the draftsman's evidence under Section 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456110