<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 504 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456109</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, a nationalized bank, condoning the delay due to an honest mistake in calculating the limitation period. The judgment of the learned single Judge was set aside, and costs were awarded to the appellant, reversing the initial dismissal of the civil suit for recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 11:55:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 504 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456109</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, a nationalized bank, condoning the delay due to an honest mistake in calculating the limitation period. The judgment of the learned single Judge was set aside, and costs were awarded to the appellant, reversing the initial dismissal of the civil suit for recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>