<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1382 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754775</link>
    <description>HC upheld tax assessment order against petitioner for incorrect tax liability reporting. Despite challenging the order and claiming available Input Tax Credit, the court found the assessment valid. Principles of natural justice were followed, and the petitioner&#039;s reply was considered. The writ petition was disposed of, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1382 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754775</link>
      <description>HC upheld tax assessment order against petitioner for incorrect tax liability reporting. Despite challenging the order and claiming available Input Tax Credit, the court found the assessment valid. Principles of natural justice were followed, and the petitioner&#039;s reply was considered. The writ petition was disposed of, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>