<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1380 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754773</link>
    <description>HC granted relief to petitioners challenging GST assessment orders for 2017-18, finding merit in their claim of lack of portal notice awareness. Court quashed impugned orders, directing petitioners to deposit 10% disputed tax, file replies within 30 days, and allowing respondents to pass fresh orders within three months, ensuring due process and right to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1380 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754773</link>
      <description>HC granted relief to petitioners challenging GST assessment orders for 2017-18, finding merit in their claim of lack of portal notice awareness. Court quashed impugned orders, directing petitioners to deposit 10% disputed tax, file replies within 30 days, and allowing respondents to pass fresh orders within three months, ensuring due process and right to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>