<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1378 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754771</link>
    <description>An assessment order that merely reproduces the taxpayer&#039;s reply and confirms the tax proposal without giving reasons cannot be sustained, because liability determinations must disclose the basis for the decision. The Madras HC therefore set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the authority to grant a reasonable opportunity of hearing, including personal hearing, and to pass a fresh order within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 09:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1378 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754771</link>
      <description>An assessment order that merely reproduces the taxpayer&#039;s reply and confirms the tax proposal without giving reasons cannot be sustained, because liability determinations must disclose the basis for the decision. The Madras HC therefore set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the authority to grant a reasonable opportunity of hearing, including personal hearing, and to pass a fresh order within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>