<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1365 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754758</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a property development company, by deleting the additions of Rs. 93,300 and Rs. 1,27,85,800. The Tribunal found the first addition unsustainable due to a minor 2.5% difference in property value and recognized the second as tax-neutral, preventing double taxation. The appeal was allowed, underscoring the importance of tax neutrality and equitable taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 09:02:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1365 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754758</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a property development company, by deleting the additions of Rs. 93,300 and Rs. 1,27,85,800. The Tribunal found the first addition unsustainable due to a minor 2.5% difference in property value and recognized the second as tax-neutral, preventing double taxation. The appeal was allowed, underscoring the importance of tax neutrality and equitable taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>