<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1346 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754739</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding long-term capital gain addition under section 50C. The DVO&#039;s fair market value determination was found inadequate as it failed to consider all factors affecting property value, including water logging, chemical contamination from nearby industrial units, and other locational disadvantages. The tribunal noted that property valuation involves estimation and the DVO ignored several material objections. Considering the inconsistencies between the DVO report and assessee&#039;s adopted price, the tribunal sustained an addition of Rs. 50,00,000 to balance the discrepancies rather than accepting the full DVO valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1346 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754739</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding long-term capital gain addition under section 50C. The DVO&#039;s fair market value determination was found inadequate as it failed to consider all factors affecting property value, including water logging, chemical contamination from nearby industrial units, and other locational disadvantages. The tribunal noted that property valuation involves estimation and the DVO ignored several material objections. Considering the inconsistencies between the DVO report and assessee&#039;s adopted price, the tribunal sustained an addition of Rs. 50,00,000 to balance the discrepancies rather than accepting the full DVO valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>