<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1345 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754738</link>
    <description>ITAT Raipur allowed the appeal of a society challenging refusal of approval under Section 80G(5). The CIT(E) had cancelled provisional approval claiming the society&#039;s objects were religious and expenses exceeded 5% of total income violating Section 80G(5B). The tribunal found the society had legitimate charitable objects including education, research, orphan support, and human welfare. Despite some religious activities, the CIT(E) failed to specify which expenses were religious or how they exceeded the 5% limit. The society held valid 12AA registration and its expenditure was not religious in nature per financial statements. The tribunal set aside the CIT(E) order and directed approval be granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1345 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754738</link>
      <description>ITAT Raipur allowed the appeal of a society challenging refusal of approval under Section 80G(5). The CIT(E) had cancelled provisional approval claiming the society&#039;s objects were religious and expenses exceeded 5% of total income violating Section 80G(5B). The tribunal found the society had legitimate charitable objects including education, research, orphan support, and human welfare. Despite some religious activities, the CIT(E) failed to specify which expenses were religious or how they exceeded the 5% limit. The society held valid 12AA registration and its expenditure was not religious in nature per financial statements. The tribunal set aside the CIT(E) order and directed approval be granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>