https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754714 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed departmental appeals regarding classification of chewing tobacco products. The tribunal held that scented tobacco falls under CETH 2403 99 10 rather than CETH 2403 99 30, following established precedent from CESTAT New Delhi. The SC had previously upheld a similar tribunal decision in favor of the assessee, settling the classification issue. Since the matter was conclusively determined by the SC, the departmental appeals lacked merit and were dismissed. en-us Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Jun 2024 07:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754714 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed departmental appeals regarding classification of chewing tobacco products. The tribunal held that scented tobacco falls under CETH 2403 99 10 rather than CETH 2403 99 30, following established precedent from CESTAT New Delhi. The SC had previously upheld a similar tribunal decision in favor of the assessee, settling the classification issue. Since the matter was conclusively determined by the SC, the departmental appeals lacked merit and were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754714