<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT addressed cash deposits during demonetization. Found lack of evidence for certain expenses. Ruled Section 115BBE for higher rate of tax not retroactive.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78911</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal considered unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The Tribunal noted the assessee&#039;s agricultural income and expenses but found insufficient evidence of various expenses. Adjusting claimed expenses, a portion of the unexplained cash remained unexplained. The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal ruled that Section 115BBE couldn&#039;t be applied retroactively as it came into force after the search. Citing precedent, the Tribunal held the addition u/s 115BBE was unsustainable. Therefore, Section 115BBE was deemed inapplicable in the case, favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:59:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:59:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT addressed cash deposits during demonetization. Found lack of evidence for certain expenses. Ruled Section 115BBE for higher rate of tax not retroactive.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78911</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal considered unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The Tribunal noted the assessee&#039;s agricultural income and expenses but found insufficient evidence of various expenses. Adjusting claimed expenses, a portion of the unexplained cash remained unexplained. The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal ruled that Section 115BBE couldn&#039;t be applied retroactively as it came into force after the search. Citing precedent, the Tribunal held the addition u/s 115BBE was unsustainable. Therefore, Section 115BBE was deemed inapplicable in the case, favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:59:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>