<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of taxpayer on LTCG &amp; deduction issues. Upholds CIT(A)&#039;s decision citing lack of Revenue challenge.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78910</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues: 1. Denial of cost of improvement in LTCG computation: AO&#039;s denial based on absence of improvement reference in sale deed and payment timing after notice issuance. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion, noting AO&#039;s similar addition in spouse&#039;s case and lack of Revenue challenge. 2. Denial of deduction u/s 54: AO&#039;s denial due to alleged failure to meet construction deadline. Tribunal affirmed CIT(A)&#039;s finding of asset sale, purchase, and compliance with u/s 54 conditions. Spouse&#039;s case comparison showed inconsistency. Tribunal ruled in favor of taxpayer, dismissing Revenue&#039;s grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:58:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of taxpayer on LTCG &amp; deduction issues. Upholds CIT(A)&#039;s decision citing lack of Revenue challenge.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78910</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues: 1. Denial of cost of improvement in LTCG computation: AO&#039;s denial based on absence of improvement reference in sale deed and payment timing after notice issuance. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion, noting AO&#039;s similar addition in spouse&#039;s case and lack of Revenue challenge. 2. Denial of deduction u/s 54: AO&#039;s denial due to alleged failure to meet construction deadline. Tribunal affirmed CIT(A)&#039;s finding of asset sale, purchase, and compliance with u/s 54 conditions. Spouse&#039;s case comparison showed inconsistency. Tribunal ruled in favor of taxpayer, dismissing Revenue&#039;s grounds.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:58:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>