<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1311 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754704</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of the writ appeal, permitting the appellant to file a review application before the Single Judge. The appellant was directed to present relevant judgments on jurisdictional issues, as the initial writ petition did not raise the jurisdiction argument. The Court emphasized the necessity of addressing jurisdictional challenges in assessment orders under the TNGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1311 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754704</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of the writ appeal, permitting the appellant to file a review application before the Single Judge. The appellant was directed to present relevant judgments on jurisdictional issues, as the initial writ petition did not raise the jurisdiction argument. The Court emphasized the necessity of addressing jurisdictional challenges in assessment orders under the TNGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>