<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754703</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax demand, finding procedural irregularities. The court remanded the matter to tax authorities, directing petitioner to pay 15% of disputed tax and providing an opportunity to contest the demand. The original order was set aside, with instructions for a fresh hearing and order within three months, without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754703</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax demand, finding procedural irregularities. The court remanded the matter to tax authorities, directing petitioner to pay 15% of disputed tax and providing an opportunity to contest the demand. The original order was set aside, with instructions for a fresh hearing and order within three months, without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>