https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754701 The HC allowed the challenge to a tax demand, finding insufficient opportunity for contest due to GST registration cancellation. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to deposit 10% of the disputed tax demand. The respondent was directed to provide a personal hearing and issue a fresh order within three months, balancing procedural fairness with tax compliance. en-us Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 May 2025 13:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754701 The HC allowed the challenge to a tax demand, finding insufficient opportunity for contest due to GST registration cancellation. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to deposit 10% of the disputed tax demand. The respondent was directed to provide a personal hearing and issue a fresh order within three months, balancing procedural fairness with tax compliance. Case-Laws GST Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754701