<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1257 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754650</link>
    <description>HC set aside tax demand order after finding lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest merits. Court mandated 10% tax remittance and directed respondent to issue fresh order within three months, providing petitioner opportunity to present arguments. Judgment emphasized principles of natural justice and procedural fairness in tax dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1257 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754650</link>
      <description>HC set aside tax demand order after finding lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest merits. Court mandated 10% tax remittance and directed respondent to issue fresh order within three months, providing petitioner opportunity to present arguments. Judgment emphasized principles of natural justice and procedural fairness in tax dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>