<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1249 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754642</link>
    <description>HC quashed an order under Section 161 of TNGST Act, 2017 for violating principles of natural justice. The court found the order was passed without hearing the petitioner, despite being reasoned. HC remitted the case back to the respondent, directing a fresh hearing within three months and allowing the petitioner an opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1249 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754642</link>
      <description>HC quashed an order under Section 161 of TNGST Act, 2017 for violating principles of natural justice. The court found the order was passed without hearing the petitioner, despite being reasoned. HC remitted the case back to the respondent, directing a fresh hearing within three months and allowing the petitioner an opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>