<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1240 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754633</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging a GST assessment order. The court found the respondent applied an incorrect notification for sanitary ware and breached natural justice by denying an adjournment. The order was set aside, with directions to reconsider the assessment, provide a personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1240 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754633</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging a GST assessment order. The court found the respondent applied an incorrect notification for sanitary ware and breached natural justice by denying an adjournment. The order was set aside, with directions to reconsider the assessment, provide a personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>