<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1239 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754632</link>
    <description>HC ruled that search and seizure order under GST Act was invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The INS-01 forms lacked proper authorization and reasons to believe. Court directed release of detained goods within three weeks and refund of deposited amount within eight weeks, effectively quashing the entire proceedings initiated by tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1239 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754632</link>
      <description>HC ruled that search and seizure order under GST Act was invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The INS-01 forms lacked proper authorization and reasons to believe. Court directed release of detained goods within three weeks and refund of deposited amount within eight weeks, effectively quashing the entire proceedings initiated by tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>