<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1238 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754631</link>
    <description>The SC found breach of natural justice in tax assessment proceedings. The court quashed the assessment orders, directing the tax authority to provide proper hearing opportunities. The petitioner was required to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration with specific procedural guidelines, including a reasonable personal hearing and fresh assessment orders within a defined timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1238 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754631</link>
      <description>The SC found breach of natural justice in tax assessment proceedings. The court quashed the assessment orders, directing the tax authority to provide proper hearing opportunities. The petitioner was required to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration with specific procedural guidelines, including a reasonable personal hearing and fresh assessment orders within a defined timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>