<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1236 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754629</link>
    <description>HC ruled against Mining Department&#039;s 18% GST demand on sand extraction royalty. Court held royalty is a tax, not a service consideration, citing Supreme Court precedents. Interim orders and evolving service definitions were examined. Case was consolidated with related matters, directing state to file counter affidavits for comprehensive resolution of the GST dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1236 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754629</link>
      <description>HC ruled against Mining Department&#039;s 18% GST demand on sand extraction royalty. Court held royalty is a tax, not a service consideration, citing Supreme Court precedents. Interim orders and evolving service definitions were examined. Case was consolidated with related matters, directing state to file counter affidavits for comprehensive resolution of the GST dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>