<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1204 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754597</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding capital gains computation where AO failed to refer property valuation to DVO under section 50C. The property was part of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme with 10-year transfer restriction. ITAT remitted matter back to AO with directions to refer valuation to DVO comparing actual sale consideration with stamp duty valuation as per allotment letter date, ensuring assessee&#039;s hearing opportunity. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:55:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1204 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754597</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding capital gains computation where AO failed to refer property valuation to DVO under section 50C. The property was part of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme with 10-year transfer restriction. ITAT remitted matter back to AO with directions to refer valuation to DVO comparing actual sale consideration with stamp duty valuation as per allotment letter date, ensuring assessee&#039;s hearing opportunity. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>