<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1186 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754579</link>
    <description>CBIC instructions dated 02.11.2023, issued to regulate filing and pursuit of appeals before the Tribunal, fixed a monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakh. Where the duty involved in each appeal was below that threshold, the instructions were treated as binding on the Department and the appeals were held not maintainable. The Tribunal also noted that the instructions contemplated withdrawal of pending cases falling below the prescribed limit. The merits of the reassessment were not examined because the appeals failed on low tax effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1186 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754579</link>
      <description>CBIC instructions dated 02.11.2023, issued to regulate filing and pursuit of appeals before the Tribunal, fixed a monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakh. Where the duty involved in each appeal was below that threshold, the instructions were treated as binding on the Department and the appeals were held not maintainable. The Tribunal also noted that the instructions contemplated withdrawal of pending cases falling below the prescribed limit. The merits of the reassessment were not examined because the appeals failed on low tax effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>