<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1181 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754574</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits. It determined that the classification of services under CRCS was unsustainable, confirming demands beyond the Show Cause Notice was legally invalid, and demands conflicting with the Show Cause Notice were not sustainable. The appellant was entitled to the composition scheme and CENVAT credit as per legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1181 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754574</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits. It determined that the classification of services under CRCS was unsustainable, confirming demands beyond the Show Cause Notice was legally invalid, and demands conflicting with the Show Cause Notice were not sustainable. The appellant was entitled to the composition scheme and CENVAT credit as per legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>