https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754572 Interest on an amount deposited during a DGCEI search was sought from the date of deposit, on the basis that the amount was allegedly collected coercively and the demand was later set aside in appeal. The department had granted interest only from the date of the appellate order to the date of refund, relying on its circular, while the petitioners argued that interest should run from the original deposit date and cited case law on compensation for delayed payment. The High Court did not examine the merits, because the petition annexed the wrong adjudication order and the petition was therefore not entertained, with liberty to file a fresh petition. en-us Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:53:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754572 Interest on an amount deposited during a DGCEI search was sought from the date of deposit, on the basis that the amount was allegedly collected coercively and the demand was later set aside in appeal. The department had granted interest only from the date of the appellate order to the date of refund, relying on its circular, while the petitioners argued that interest should run from the original deposit date and cited case law on compensation for delayed payment. The High Court did not examine the merits, because the petition annexed the wrong adjudication order and the petition was therefore not entertained, with liberty to file a fresh petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754572