https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754570 CESTAT Allahabad allowed the appeal regarding classification of aerated drinks and fruit pulp/juice based beverages under different brand names. The tribunal held that products should be classified under Tariff Heading 2202 9020 as fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks rather than under Chapter Sub-heading 22021020, covering the period April 2011 to August 2012. The decision followed a Larger Bench ruling in a similar case involving beverage manufacturers, which established that products like Minute Maid Nimbu Fresh and 7UP Nimbooz fall under the fruit pulp/juice based drinks category. The classification issue was considered settled law favoring the appellant. en-us Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:53:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754570 CESTAT Allahabad allowed the appeal regarding classification of aerated drinks and fruit pulp/juice based beverages under different brand names. The tribunal held that products should be classified under Tariff Heading 2202 9020 as fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks rather than under Chapter Sub-heading 22021020, covering the period April 2011 to August 2012. The decision followed a Larger Bench ruling in a similar case involving beverage manufacturers, which established that products like Minute Maid Nimbu Fresh and 7UP Nimbooz fall under the fruit pulp/juice based drinks category. The classification issue was considered settled law favoring the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754570