<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1170 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754563</link>
    <description>A writ petition seeking refund was not entertained on merits because the record raised disputed questions of fact, including service of notice and the ence of assessment orders for the relevant period. The High Court declined to adjudicate the refund claim in writ jurisdiction and directed the competent authority to decide the pending refund applications afresh by a reasoned order within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:52:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1170 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754563</link>
      <description>A writ petition seeking refund was not entertained on merits because the record raised disputed questions of fact, including service of notice and the ence of assessment orders for the relevant period. The High Court declined to adjudicate the refund claim in writ jurisdiction and directed the competent authority to decide the pending refund applications afresh by a reasoned order within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>