<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37221</link>
    <description>The court held that Section 9(2)(a)(iv) of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act did not apply to transfers made by the assessee as the karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Consequently, the Board of Revenue&#039;s decision to include the gifted lands in the assessee&#039;s assessment was overturned. The tax cases were allowed with costs, and the counsel&#039;s fee was set at Rs. 250.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:18:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37221</link>
      <description>The court held that Section 9(2)(a)(iv) of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act did not apply to transfers made by the assessee as the karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Consequently, the Board of Revenue&#039;s decision to include the gifted lands in the assessee&#039;s assessment was overturned. The tax cases were allowed with costs, and the counsel&#039;s fee was set at Rs. 250.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>