<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1495 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456088</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2010-11 and A.Y. 2012-13, directing the deletion of penalties under section 271B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s bona-fide belief concerning turnover calculation, concluding that the penalties were unjustified, thus ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1495 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456088</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2010-11 and A.Y. 2012-13, directing the deletion of penalties under section 271B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s bona-fide belief concerning turnover calculation, concluding that the penalties were unjustified, thus ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>