<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754561</link>
    <description>Tax dispute involving Input Tax Credit (ITC) claim for goods vehicle. HC found respondent did not provide reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand. Court set aside impugned order, directing petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax and granted opportunity to submit reply. Respondent instructed to conduct fresh hearing and issue revised order within three months, ensuring principles of natural justice were followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754561</link>
      <description>Tax dispute involving Input Tax Credit (ITC) claim for goods vehicle. HC found respondent did not provide reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand. Court set aside impugned order, directing petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax and granted opportunity to submit reply. Respondent instructed to conduct fresh hearing and issue revised order within three months, ensuring principles of natural justice were followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>