<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1166 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754559</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax order and recovery notice. The court set aside the original order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and granted the petitioner two weeks to submit additional documents. The respondent was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity for a fresh order within three months, and the bank attachment was lifted. The case was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1166 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754559</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax order and recovery notice. The court set aside the original order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and granted the petitioner two weeks to submit additional documents. The respondent was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity for a fresh order within three months, and the bank attachment was lifted. The case was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>