<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1161 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754554</link>
    <description>HC disposed of petition involving CGST Act time extension application. Court directed Respondent No. 2 to decide extension request within four weeks, mandating prior hearing notice. Impugned order in appeal was quashed, with directive for de novo adjudication within specified timeframe. Petition concluded without cost implications, ensuring procedural compliance and fair hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1161 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754554</link>
      <description>HC disposed of petition involving CGST Act time extension application. Court directed Respondent No. 2 to decide extension request within four weeks, mandating prior hearing notice. Impugned order in appeal was quashed, with directive for de novo adjudication within specified timeframe. Petition concluded without cost implications, ensuring procedural compliance and fair hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>