<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1151 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754544</link>
    <description>Temporary registration under r.16 of the GST Rules was challenged on the ground that no e-way bill was generated and documents were allegedly absent. The HC held that r.16 authorises the proper officer to grant temporary registration where a person liable to be registered fails to apply, and s.24(i) mandates compulsory registration for inter-State taxable supply. As the petitioner undertook inter-State supply without the requisite registration, temporary registration was legally justified. The HC further found prima facie misuse of the GST framework by issuing invoices depicting an alternative purchase/supply trail, warranting coordinated investigation with the other State GST authority. The writ petition was dismissed, with directions for thorough inquiry and action under the GST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1151 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754544</link>
      <description>Temporary registration under r.16 of the GST Rules was challenged on the ground that no e-way bill was generated and documents were allegedly absent. The HC held that r.16 authorises the proper officer to grant temporary registration where a person liable to be registered fails to apply, and s.24(i) mandates compulsory registration for inter-State taxable supply. As the petitioner undertook inter-State supply without the requisite registration, temporary registration was legally justified. The HC further found prima facie misuse of the GST framework by issuing invoices depicting an alternative purchase/supply trail, warranting coordinated investigation with the other State GST authority. The writ petition was dismissed, with directions for thorough inquiry and action under the GST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>