<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1149 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754542</link>
    <description>HC addressed the non-constitution of Appellate Tribunal under CGST/OGST Act, 2017. Court disposed of writ petition by directing petitioner to file appeal under Section 112 once Tribunal is constituted. Statutory remedy and time limits for appeal were clarified through removal of difficulties order and circular, ensuring procedural fairness while allowing authorities to proceed legally if appeal is not filed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1149 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754542</link>
      <description>HC addressed the non-constitution of Appellate Tribunal under CGST/OGST Act, 2017. Court disposed of writ petition by directing petitioner to file appeal under Section 112 once Tribunal is constituted. Statutory remedy and time limits for appeal were clarified through removal of difficulties order and circular, ensuring procedural fairness while allowing authorities to proceed legally if appeal is not filed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>