<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1127 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754520</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad set aside the PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding revenue recognition methods and closing stock valuation. The tribunal held that while the AO may have erred by not properly inquiring into the assessee&#039;s accounting methods, no prejudice was caused to revenue since the assessee offered income over the project period and paid due taxes. The different timing of income recognition under percentage completion method versus assessee&#039;s method was deemed tax neutral, as was the closing stock valuation. Since both conditions for invoking section 263 - erroneous order and prejudice to revenue - were not satisfied, the original assessment order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:29:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1127 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754520</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad set aside the PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding revenue recognition methods and closing stock valuation. The tribunal held that while the AO may have erred by not properly inquiring into the assessee&#039;s accounting methods, no prejudice was caused to revenue since the assessee offered income over the project period and paid due taxes. The different timing of income recognition under percentage completion method versus assessee&#039;s method was deemed tax neutral, as was the closing stock valuation. Since both conditions for invoking section 263 - erroneous order and prejudice to revenue - were not satisfied, the original assessment order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>