<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1106 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754499</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeal regarding input service credit for consultancy services availed from EVIPL for trading carbon credit points. The Revenue denied credit claiming it was unconnected with manufacturing or output services. The tribunal held that R-23 gas is a natural by-product of R-22 manufacture, destroyed per Kyoto protocol norms, making the manufacturer eligible for carbon credits. Following Delhi Bench precedent in SHREE BHAWANI PAPER MILLS case, the tribunal ruled that income from consultancy services need not be subject to excise or service tax. The credit claimed was lawful and denial was improper.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1106 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754499</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeal regarding input service credit for consultancy services availed from EVIPL for trading carbon credit points. The Revenue denied credit claiming it was unconnected with manufacturing or output services. The tribunal held that R-23 gas is a natural by-product of R-22 manufacture, destroyed per Kyoto protocol norms, making the manufacturer eligible for carbon credits. Following Delhi Bench precedent in SHREE BHAWANI PAPER MILLS case, the tribunal ruled that income from consultancy services need not be subject to excise or service tax. The credit claimed was lawful and denial was improper.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>