<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1105 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754498</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit relief or refund is admissible where duty-paid inputs are used to manufacture nil-duty final products that are exported. The analysis applied the export exception under Rule 6 and the refund mechanism under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, recognising that the scheme is intended to prevent indirect double taxation on exported goods. On that basis, rejection of the refund claim was inconsistent with the settled position and was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:28:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1105 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754498</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit relief or refund is admissible where duty-paid inputs are used to manufacture nil-duty final products that are exported. The analysis applied the export exception under Rule 6 and the refund mechanism under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, recognising that the scheme is intended to prevent indirect double taxation on exported goods. On that basis, rejection of the refund claim was inconsistent with the settled position and was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>