<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 2108 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456074</link>
    <description>ITAT Cochin upheld AO&#039;s addition for suppression of sales and turnover estimation following search and seizure operations. The jewellery firm practiced issuing estimate slips instead of proper sale bills, resulting in 84.39% of business remaining outside books. Based on evidence from assessment year 2008-09 showing systematic suppression pattern, AO correctly estimated income for previous years 2005-06 to 2007-08 under Section 153A. The tribunal rejected assessee&#039;s books of accounts and confirmed the estimation methodology, applying the principle that undisclosed income computation should be based on search evidence. Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 2108 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456074</link>
      <description>ITAT Cochin upheld AO&#039;s addition for suppression of sales and turnover estimation following search and seizure operations. The jewellery firm practiced issuing estimate slips instead of proper sale bills, resulting in 84.39% of business remaining outside books. Based on evidence from assessment year 2008-09 showing systematic suppression pattern, AO correctly estimated income for previous years 2005-06 to 2007-08 under Section 153A. The tribunal rejected assessee&#039;s books of accounts and confirmed the estimation methodology, applying the principle that undisclosed income computation should be based on search evidence. Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>